Dot Wedge
 |
Meprolight Tru-Dot Wedge Sight Kimber Custom Fixed ML11219 Sale Price: $91.10  |
|
Meprolight Tru-Dot Wedge Sight Kimber Custom Fixed Part number: MPL11219 |
 |
Kimber Tru-Dot~ Sight, Tactical Wedge Custom, Compact & Ultra Set Kimber Tru-Dot Sight, Tactical Wedge Custom, Compact & Ultra |
|
2 sight set includes front and rear sights Brightest night sight set available on the market, up to 20-percent brighter than other brands Combat proven, used by military and law enforcement Needs no external energy source Lightweight sight requires no weapon modification Works under all weather conditions Fixed tactical wedge set designed for use on the Warrior and Raptor series pistols Covered by a manufacturer's 12-year usable illumination warranty to original purchaserThe Meprolight TD Tactical Wedge Custom, Compact, and Ultra Fixed Set makes sure you have a clear, sharp sight picture, even in the dark... |
|
Meprolight Tru-Dot Wedge Sight Kimber Custom Fixed Sale Price: $129.99 |
|
Meprolight Tru-Dot Wedge Sight Kimber Custom Fixed |
How to solve this proof?
I have to solve a proof in my PHIL class and I can't get the answer. I was wondering if anyone could help me?
The premises given are:
1. ~(~E.~N)>T
2. G>(NvE) (conclusion) / G>T
.=dot, v=wedge, >=horseshoe, and ~=tilde
I've tried solving this everywhich way. Does anyone know how to solve it?
I tried using DeMorgan's rule to get (EvN)>T. But, first, I had to have (~~Ev~~N)>T, and it wouldn't let me use Double Negation to get rid of the '~~'. So, I got stuck.
Note that ~(~E.~N) is logically equivalent to (NvE) so statement
1 is equivalent to (NvE)>T, so if you have G>(NvE) then you
have (transitivity) G>T
« Wood Orlimar | Home | Baseball Shoes »
Leave a Comment